WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.304 --> 00:00:02.006
Safer Chemicals Podcast.

2
00:00:02.726 --> 00:00:04.851
 Sound science on harmful chemicals.

3
00:00:10.577 --> 00:00:12.616
 Welcome to the Safer Chemicals Podcast.

4
00:00:13.179 --> 00:00:13.937
 I'm Adam Elwan,

5
00:00:14.241 --> 00:00:16.843
 and today I'm joined by Roberto Scazzola.

6
00:00:17.077 --> 00:00:18.983
 He's the chair of our Committee for Risk Assessment,

7
00:00:19.390 --> 00:00:20.561
 as well as Maria Ottati,

8
00:00:20.905 --> 00:00:23.280
 who chairs our Socio-Economic Analysis Committee.

9
00:00:24.171 --> 00:00:24.311
 Now,

10
00:00:24.468 --> 00:00:25.874
 today we'll be going through key updates from the recent meetings of the committees,

11
00:00:28.342 --> 00:00:29.303
 and to kick us off,

12
00:00:29.443 --> 00:00:33.006
 we'll cover the latest on the universal PFAS restriction proposal.

13
00:00:34.006 --> 00:00:34.490
 After that,

14
00:00:34.951 --> 00:00:42.498
 we'll get an outlook on new tasks that are coming to both committees and how they will be expanding their evaluations to new areas of work.

15
00:00:43.514 --> 00:00:44.904
 To wrap up today's episode,

16
00:00:45.186 --> 00:00:52.373
 we'll talk to Roberto about a recent court ruling on the harmonised classification and labelling of titanium dioxide.

17
00:00:53.460 --> 00:00:53.861
 Roberto,

18
00:00:53.981 --> 00:00:54.281
 Maria,

19
00:00:54.401 --> 00:00:56.623
 it's great to have you both on the podcast again.

20
00:00:56.803 --> 00:00:58.145
 And for the first time,

21
00:00:58.223 --> 00:00:58.606
 Roberto,

22
00:00:58.664 --> 00:01:01.824
 you're actually joining us remotely from a much warmer climate,

23
00:01:01.871 --> 00:01:02.207
 I hear.

24
00:01:02.270 --> 00:01:02.668
 Not that I'm,

25
00:01:02.793 --> 00:01:03.028
 you know,

26
00:01:03.168 --> 00:01:04.113
 jealous or anything at all,

27
00:01:04.270 --> 00:01:05.434
 but where are you joining from?

28
00:01:06.770 --> 00:01:07.457
Thank you very much,

29
00:01:07.512 --> 00:01:07.715
 Adam,

30
00:01:07.778 --> 00:01:10.403
 for inviting us and to our listeners for joining.

31
00:01:10.637 --> 00:01:10.996
 Indeed,

32
00:01:11.043 --> 00:01:15.996
 I managed to escape from the start of the autumn in Helsinki and I'm here in Venice,

33
00:01:16.184 --> 00:01:16.949
 actually Italy.

34
00:01:17.590 --> 00:01:22.184
 So I'll try to share some of the sun and the energy that I got from this nice trip.

35
00:01:22.371 --> 00:01:22.824
Please do.

36
00:01:23.016 --> 00:01:24.117
 We need it desperately here.

37
00:01:24.118 --> 00:01:24.657
 At least I do.

38
00:01:24.658 --> 00:01:25.236
 I don't know about you,

39
00:01:25.257 --> 00:01:25.376
Maria.

40
00:01:25.396 --> 00:01:26.597
 It's quite an overcast day.

41
00:01:26.716 --> 00:01:27.699
 So definitely,

42
00:01:27.718 --> 00:01:29.117
 I think that will be much needed.

43
00:01:29.218 --> 00:01:31.218
 And thank you very much from my side as well,

44
00:01:31.257 --> 00:01:31.460
 Adam.

45
00:01:31.499 --> 00:01:35.820
 I'm really looking forward to telling you a little bit more about what we discussed in the plenary.

46
00:01:36.460 --> 00:01:36.757
All right,

47
00:01:36.758 --> 00:01:40.460
 let's get started then with the universal PFAS restriction proposal.

48
00:01:40.523 --> 00:01:40.663
 Now,

49
00:01:40.742 --> 00:01:40.960
 here,

50
00:01:41.179 --> 00:01:43.976
 the committees have been evaluating it for quite some time.

51
00:01:45.054 --> 00:01:46.648
 And I know from Roberto's side,

52
00:01:46.679 --> 00:01:48.976
 RAC is nearing completion of its risk-based evaluation.

53
00:01:49.007 --> 00:01:52.523
 But there was a milestone recently with the submission of a background document.

54
00:01:53.493 --> 00:01:54.913
 And I'd like to hear a bit more about that.

55
00:01:54.974 --> 00:01:55.736
 So maybe Maria,

56
00:01:55.775 --> 00:01:56.915
 you can shed some light on this one.

57
00:01:58.158 --> 00:01:58.357
Okay,

58
00:01:58.415 --> 00:01:59.318
 so first of all,

59
00:01:59.357 --> 00:02:01.962
 maybe I can tell you what we mean by a background document.

60
00:02:02.244 --> 00:02:03.322
 So basically,

61
00:02:03.345 --> 00:02:06.829
 the five countries submitted way back in January 2023,

62
00:02:06.830 --> 00:02:10.142
 their proposal on the universal PFAS restriction.

63
00:02:10.829 --> 00:02:13.439
 And as it enters the opinion making,

64
00:02:13.486 --> 00:02:17.814
 then we start calling that proposal the background document as it gets updated.

65
00:02:17.829 --> 00:02:19.204
 So what's been happening is that,

66
00:02:19.314 --> 00:02:19.751
 as you know,

67
00:02:19.752 --> 00:02:22.220
 we had a very big consultation on the proposal.

68
00:02:22.836 --> 00:02:26.700
 And the five countries have been analyzing the comments that came in,

69
00:02:27.259 --> 00:02:31.841
 and they have been progressively updating their proposal based on those comments.

70
00:02:31.888 --> 00:02:35.232
 So we have been receiving staged updates,

71
00:02:35.286 --> 00:02:35.747
 basically.

72
00:02:35.810 --> 00:02:39.060
 So they have started sector by sector and use by use,

73
00:02:39.747 --> 00:02:40.654
 sending us updates.

74
00:02:40.669 --> 00:02:48.482
 So the opinions that we have been discussing all these past two years have been based on these graduated updates that we've received.

75
00:02:48.904 --> 00:02:50.950
 But now they have finally finished it.

76
00:02:51.688 --> 00:02:52.989
 And whereas those,

77
00:02:54.130 --> 00:02:54.411
 you know,

78
00:02:54.571 --> 00:02:58.915
 stage updates we were making available only to those participating to the meetings and,

79
00:02:58.916 --> 00:02:59.275
 of course,

80
00:02:59.595 --> 00:03:00.259
 to the committee,

81
00:03:00.759 --> 00:03:02.157
 now this has been published,

82
00:03:02.923 --> 00:03:03.157
 you know,

83
00:03:03.220 --> 00:03:03.798
 for everyone.

84
00:03:03.821 --> 00:03:06.079
 So that's on our website now and that can be found.

85
00:03:06.845 --> 00:03:12.142
 So in addition to adding more information about the sectors that they had already analysed,

86
00:03:12.143 --> 00:03:16.954
 they have added some new sectors and they have also developed what we would call a new sector.

87
00:03:17.004 --> 00:03:18.325
 could call horizontal issues,

88
00:03:18.345 --> 00:03:21.530
 so areas that apply to all the different sectors.

89
00:03:21.569 --> 00:03:24.112
 So that has been developed quite a lot more.

90
00:03:24.350 --> 00:03:26.116
 And that's now in what you can find online.

91
00:03:26.514 --> 00:03:26.710
Okay,

92
00:03:26.756 --> 00:03:28.913
 I know we'll talk about the horizontal issues later on as well.

93
00:03:28.914 --> 00:03:29.256
 We will,

94
00:03:29.257 --> 00:03:31.499
because we looked at it in both of the committees.

95
00:03:31.655 --> 00:03:31.858
Yes.

96
00:03:31.881 --> 00:03:32.421
 So basically,

97
00:03:32.422 --> 00:03:38.663
 this background document is actually the backbone then of what you should be looking at and feeds into your opinion or the committee's opinion.

98
00:03:38.956 --> 00:03:39.156
Yes,

99
00:03:39.216 --> 00:03:39.677
 exactly.

100
00:03:39.797 --> 00:03:41.279
But now it's stable and finalized.

101
00:03:41.280 --> 00:03:42.400
 So you don't expect any changes,

102
00:03:42.420 --> 00:03:43.980
 which I assume is a good thing at this point.

103
00:03:43.981 --> 00:03:46.664
 So you can go ahead without worrying about new information coming.

104
00:03:46.746 --> 00:03:47.105
Exactly.

105
00:03:47.121 --> 00:03:49.246
 So this is basically what the committees are assessing.

106
00:03:49.324 --> 00:03:54.129
 So that's very important that it's out there so that people when they see our opinions,

107
00:03:54.191 --> 00:03:55.519
 which is coming,

108
00:03:56.097 --> 00:03:58.800
 they will understand now what their opinions are.

109
00:03:59.019 --> 00:03:59.222
Yes.

110
00:03:59.269 --> 00:04:01.816
 And the reasoning behind it as well on the basis for it.

111
00:04:01.832 --> 00:04:02.004
 Okay,

112
00:04:02.035 --> 00:04:02.175
 good.

113
00:04:02.548 --> 00:04:07.011
 Let's then move on to the Risk Assessment Committee's discussion on these.

114
00:04:07.053 --> 00:04:07.175
 So,

115
00:04:07.452 --> 00:04:07.835
 Roberto,

116
00:04:07.893 --> 00:04:10.096
 can you shed some light on different sectors?

117
00:04:11.393 --> 00:04:11.659
Sure.

118
00:04:11.940 --> 00:04:17.260
 Perhaps we can start from the most complex and most interesting given sector.

119
00:04:17.300 --> 00:04:20.151
 I would say electronics and semiconductors.

120
00:04:20.792 --> 00:04:23.776
 PFASs are used in this sector due to their properties,

121
00:04:23.870 --> 00:04:25.354
 their electrical properties,

122
00:04:25.432 --> 00:04:26.307
 thermal stability,

123
00:04:26.385 --> 00:04:27.932
 but also chemical resistance.

124
00:04:28.628 --> 00:04:34.313
 It's probably the biggest sector in terms of received comments and also quite complex with many,

125
00:04:34.574 --> 00:04:35.977
 many different applications.

126
00:04:36.477 --> 00:04:37.797
 So when it goes to electronics,

127
00:04:37.977 --> 00:04:39.195
 we refer to wires,

128
00:04:39.281 --> 00:04:39.820
 cables,

129
00:04:40.477 --> 00:04:41.805
 printed circuit boards,

130
00:04:42.078 --> 00:04:44.602
 flat panel displays and so forward.

131
00:04:45.102 --> 00:04:53.305
 And then we have also semiconductors that are very important due to the electrical conductivity between a conductor and an insulator.

132
00:04:53.852 --> 00:04:56.180
 and this means uses within...

133
00:04:56.528 --> 00:04:57.070
 o-rings,

134
00:04:57.170 --> 00:04:57.672
 gaskets,

135
00:04:57.793 --> 00:04:59.096
 wafers and coatings.

136
00:04:59.378 --> 00:05:02.065
 And as usual Rack assess the volumes.

137
00:05:02.896 --> 00:05:04.458
 PFAS that are used in those sectors,

138
00:05:04.597 --> 00:05:10.402
 but also the expected emissions that are therefore uncontrolled and could reach the environment.

139
00:05:10.746 --> 00:05:12.464
 So we look at the volumes,

140
00:05:12.504 --> 00:05:13.144
 as mentioned,

141
00:05:13.222 --> 00:05:14.785
 for both sub-uses,

142
00:05:14.847 --> 00:05:16.589
 electronics and semiconductors.

143
00:05:17.308 --> 00:05:20.207
 And we found also interesting figures.

144
00:05:21.129 --> 00:05:30.066
 And electronics seems to be the sub-application that results in higher emissions in the order of 380 tons per year,

145
00:05:30.629 --> 00:05:31.457
 while semiconductors...

146
00:05:31.880 --> 00:05:35.403
 is in the order of 50 tons per year as a midpoint.

147
00:05:35.765 --> 00:05:39.866
 We also expressed a view on the effectiveness of the restriction options,

148
00:05:40.366 --> 00:05:48.038
 and we looked whether there are potential alternatives and what are the risks and the hazards possibly related to the use of those alternatives.

149
00:05:48.757 --> 00:05:48.976
Okay.

150
00:05:49.319 --> 00:05:51.241
 And I understood quite a lot of stakeholders.

151
00:05:51.413 --> 00:05:51.648
 I mean,

152
00:05:51.898 --> 00:05:53.319
 this topic has a lot of interest,

153
00:05:53.335 --> 00:05:53.976
 but here as well,

154
00:05:54.023 --> 00:05:56.304
 there was a high attendance rate from stakeholders,

155
00:05:56.366 --> 00:05:56.585
 right?

156
00:05:58.429 --> 00:05:58.710
Indeed,

157
00:05:58.804 --> 00:05:59.054
 Adam.

158
00:05:59.069 --> 00:06:00.335
 I think you have a-

159
00:06:00.336 --> 00:06:00.905
 a point here.

160
00:06:00.965 --> 00:06:02.367
 We had a great attendance.

161
00:06:02.445 --> 00:06:04.988
 Many stakeholders expressed an interest.

162
00:06:05.488 --> 00:06:06.308
 And I have to admit,

163
00:06:06.590 --> 00:06:09.894
 there was a constructive and very collaborative way of working.

164
00:06:09.895 --> 00:06:15.597
 And we definitely appreciate it because the input of stakeholders is very important to make this right.

165
00:06:15.762 --> 00:06:17.058
All right.

166
00:06:17.105 --> 00:06:17.777
 Great to hear that.

167
00:06:17.824 --> 00:06:18.058
 Thanks.

168
00:06:18.137 --> 00:06:19.121
 Thanks for the update on that.

169
00:06:19.246 --> 00:06:24.480
 And good to see that stakeholders are contributing and coming up with useful information that you can make use of in your opinion forming.

170
00:06:25.496 --> 00:06:28.168
 What about then the next bigger sector,

171
00:06:28.215 --> 00:06:28.652
 I assume?

172
00:06:29.056 --> 00:06:30.377
 PFAS manufacturing sector.

173
00:06:32.699 --> 00:06:33.019
Indeed,

174
00:06:33.519 --> 00:06:36.824
 that's a very important one and even a special one if you want,

175
00:06:36.863 --> 00:06:45.371
 because actually it's the starting point of everything because you first manufacture PFAS and then they are provided and purchased for multiple uses.

176
00:06:45.871 --> 00:06:48.293
 But we are also aware that in several,

177
00:06:48.294 --> 00:06:48.777
 in some

178
00:06:49.215 --> 00:06:51.324
 PFAS manufacturing sites across Europe,

179
00:06:51.699 --> 00:06:56.137
 there have been serious pollution cases that affected soil,

180
00:06:56.340 --> 00:06:57.465
 sediment and water.

181
00:06:58.116 --> 00:07:01.557
 And we've also found that the remediation of those cases is very costly,

182
00:07:01.797 --> 00:07:02.536
 and if possible,

183
00:07:02.555 --> 00:07:02.977
 at all.

184
00:07:03.418 --> 00:07:08.399
 And this also resulted in national measures and possibly ultimately to this restriction because a number of

185
00:07:08.875 --> 00:07:12.282
 European countries found that we should act at European level.

186
00:07:13.297 --> 00:07:13.922
 In this sector,

187
00:07:13.938 --> 00:07:15.657
 we had the usual assessment in RAC,

188
00:07:16.157 --> 00:07:18.485
 estimating the volumes and also the emissions.

189
00:07:18.938 --> 00:07:26.157
 And maybe one element I would like to mention is we have also been informed that there is an industry-led initiative,

190
00:07:26.158 --> 00:07:27.125
 a voluntary one.

191
00:07:27.424 --> 00:07:30.747
 on actually reducing emissions and controlling them.

192
00:07:31.409 --> 00:07:39.940
 And this has been taken forward by the dossiers submitters in a restriction proposal that would build actually,

193
00:07:40.456 --> 00:07:46.659
 starting from this voluntary initiative and proposing also other measures that could really reduce emissions.

194
00:07:47.159 --> 00:07:48.690
 We found this very interesting,

195
00:07:49.050 --> 00:07:51.221
 and this is linked to an unlimited derogation,

196
00:07:51.675 --> 00:07:55.471
 linked to a maximum emission limits to be respected both for...

197
00:07:55.856 --> 00:07:56.596
 air emissions,

198
00:07:56.656 --> 00:07:58.437
 but also for any wastewater,

199
00:07:58.536 --> 00:07:59.696
 a production site.

200
00:08:00.017 --> 00:08:00.255
Okay,

201
00:08:00.599 --> 00:08:00.958
 interesting.

202
00:08:00.959 --> 00:08:02.896
 On this unlimited derogation idea,

203
00:08:03.357 --> 00:08:03.982
 what would then be,

204
00:08:04.396 --> 00:08:04.638
 I mean,

205
00:08:04.958 --> 00:08:06.841
 what would the emissions limits look like?

206
00:08:07.060 --> 00:08:09.419
 And how would compliance actually be demonstrated?

207
00:08:11.216 --> 00:08:12.466
That's a very good question.

208
00:08:12.544 --> 00:08:14.372
 And we had a preliminary discussion,

209
00:08:14.966 --> 00:08:15.747
 this time at RAC,

210
00:08:16.122 --> 00:08:20.544
 and we have actually requested the dossier submitter to provide additional elements.

211
00:08:20.841 --> 00:08:22.716
 How can we demonstrate compliance?

212
00:08:22.825 --> 00:08:23.247
 How can...

213
00:08:23.824 --> 00:08:28.270
 economic operators being sure to fulfill those criteria if,

214
00:08:28.290 --> 00:08:28.770
 of course,

215
00:08:28.911 --> 00:08:32.833
 this restriction will be finalized in the way it has been presented today.

216
00:08:33.177 --> 00:08:38.020
 So we actually plan to come back in December with additional elements,

217
00:08:38.075 --> 00:08:40.239
 and we know that the dossier submitter is already,

218
00:08:40.708 --> 00:08:42.130
 they are already working on that.

219
00:08:43.958 --> 00:08:47.489
Then let's go to these horizontal issues that we mentioned earlier.

220
00:08:47.552 --> 00:08:47.802
 Can you,

221
00:08:48.552 --> 00:08:48.942
 first of all,

222
00:08:48.943 --> 00:08:51.395
 explain a little bit more about what they are exactly?

223
00:08:52.936 --> 00:08:54.978
They are cross-cutting issues.

224
00:08:55.439 --> 00:08:57.181
 That means that they're not sector-specific,

225
00:08:57.201 --> 00:08:58.623
 but they apply horizontally.

226
00:08:58.861 --> 00:09:01.744
 So you can think of them like the backbone of the restriction.

227
00:09:02.502 --> 00:09:05.947
 And they apply to the concentration limits,

228
00:09:05.986 --> 00:09:08.533
 above which PFAS will be restricted,

229
00:09:08.595 --> 00:09:16.877
 but also the hazard assessment and the general risk management measures that are needed to monitor and to reduce environmental emissions.

230
00:09:17.861 --> 00:09:19.345
 We have already discussed this.

231
00:09:19.642 --> 00:09:20.002
 However,

232
00:09:20.158 --> 00:09:21.502
 few topics needed to be...

233
00:09:22.268 --> 00:09:24.571
 fine-tune or I would say re-discussed.

234
00:09:24.710 --> 00:09:27.212
 And that's what we have done actually last week.

235
00:09:28.474 --> 00:09:28.673
Okay.

236
00:09:28.674 --> 00:09:28.954
 And Maria,

237
00:09:28.974 --> 00:09:31.919
 I understand that also in the socio-economic analysis committee,

238
00:09:31.958 --> 00:09:34.302
 you've looked at horizontal issues for the same sectors.

239
00:09:34.303 --> 00:09:35.458
 So how does that play in?

240
00:09:35.544 --> 00:09:35.685
Yeah,

241
00:09:35.763 --> 00:09:35.942
 well,

242
00:09:36.099 --> 00:09:36.239
 in

243
00:09:36.903 --> 00:09:40.302
 SEAC, we look at different horizontal issues or well,

244
00:09:40.364 --> 00:09:41.942
 some of them we look at in both committees,

245
00:09:42.021 --> 00:09:44.958
 but it's slightly different from the ones that Roberto has named.

246
00:09:44.974 --> 00:09:49.411
 It's the same kinds of issues that apply across the board for all the sectors and all the uses.

247
00:09:50.160 --> 00:09:50.761
 And we're talking,

248
00:09:51.182 --> 00:09:51.642
 for instance,

249
00:09:51.662 --> 00:09:53.264
 things about spare parts,

250
00:09:53.322 --> 00:09:54.002
 recycling,

251
00:09:54.026 --> 00:09:55.666
 that sort of thing that we haven't discussed yet,

252
00:09:55.686 --> 00:09:56.385
 but that is coming.

253
00:09:56.846 --> 00:09:59.252
 So this time we discuss practicality only.

254
00:09:59.971 --> 00:10:01.033
 And in SEAC,

255
00:10:01.034 --> 00:10:05.033
 we also have what we call more general approach issues,

256
00:10:05.112 --> 00:10:08.244
 which we discuss in the same sort of slot in the committee.

257
00:10:08.713 --> 00:10:09.276
 And this is,

258
00:10:09.401 --> 00:10:09.526
 OK,

259
00:10:09.697 --> 00:10:11.526
 what has been the approach used?

260
00:10:11.704 --> 00:10:14.926
 to develop the dossier and what is the approach we use to assess that.

261
00:10:14.987 --> 00:10:22.036
 So we have quite a lot of discussion on that because that helps to set out how we're going to do things before we actually do them.

262
00:10:22.075 --> 00:10:23.895
 And that helps the discussions a lot.

263
00:10:24.575 --> 00:10:24.778
Okay.

264
00:10:24.895 --> 00:10:32.637
 And what would you then say are the most important takeaways for our audience from this Risk Assessment Committee meeting regarding the proposed restriction?

265
00:10:34.279 --> 00:10:34.459
Well,

266
00:10:34.499 --> 00:10:34.940
 first of all,

267
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:37.802
 I think very good progress has been made.

268
00:10:37.883 --> 00:10:38.183
 I mean,

269
00:10:38.424 --> 00:10:45.693
 this is a very big exercise and there are a lot of colleagues that are actually involved into it and we are moving forward.

270
00:10:46.091 --> 00:10:52.404
 So that's a big thank you to the committee members and to all stakeholders that participated constructively in this.

271
00:10:53.138 --> 00:10:53.420
 And also,

272
00:10:53.435 --> 00:10:54.732
 I think we are for the first time,

273
00:10:54.763 --> 00:10:55.920
 as Maria explained earlier,

274
00:10:55.998 --> 00:10:59.560
 with the submission of the final version of the background document,

275
00:10:59.561 --> 00:11:02.841
 we have finally visibility when we can conclude this activity,

276
00:11:02.873 --> 00:11:03.763
 at least for RAC.

277
00:11:04.327 --> 00:11:10.493
 So we expect to conclude discussions on the 14 sectors and on PFAS manufacturing by end of this year.

278
00:11:11.196 --> 00:11:15.696
 And then RAC should be in the condition to adopt the opinion in March 2026.

279
00:11:16.743 --> 00:11:17.938
That sounds indeed promising.

280
00:11:17.961 --> 00:11:22.383
 I'm sure many of our listeners are also happy to hear that there's a timeline now available.

281
00:11:22.758 --> 00:11:29.227
 Can you explain then the gap of the three months then by the end of the year and then March next year for the opinion?

282
00:11:30.852 --> 00:11:31.008
Well,

283
00:11:31.287 --> 00:11:32.028
 Fingers crossed,

284
00:11:32.088 --> 00:11:34.090
 we will conclude the discussion in December,

285
00:11:34.311 --> 00:11:44.621
 but then we will still need some time to carefully draft the opinion text and to ensure that all horizontal issues are reflected in the same way in all the different applications.

286
00:11:44.660 --> 00:11:45.184
 For instance,

287
00:11:45.262 --> 00:11:48.160
 the risk of alternatives that we are doing as a committee.

288
00:11:48.707 --> 00:11:49.629
 This takes time,

289
00:11:50.066 --> 00:11:51.394
 as the proposal is very big,

290
00:11:51.410 --> 00:11:53.832
 as already mentioned and commented multiple times.

291
00:11:54.410 --> 00:11:58.238
 And we need to put together all the 14 sectors and the PFAS manufacturing.

292
00:11:58.351 --> 00:12:04.897
 in a way that this will be coherent and homogeneous and could be then processed by the European Commission and member states.

293
00:12:05.159 --> 00:12:07.702
 So we want basically to have a scientific sound,

294
00:12:07.741 --> 00:12:09.163
 but also a consistent opinion.

295
00:12:09.764 --> 00:12:10.600
 And our goal now,

296
00:12:10.639 --> 00:12:12.061
 I think we can be outspoken,

297
00:12:12.147 --> 00:12:15.264
 is to conclude at least in RAC by March 2026.

298
00:12:16.405 --> 00:12:17.374
So on to you then,

299
00:12:17.436 --> 00:12:17.749
 Maria.

300
00:12:18.467 --> 00:12:18.592
 The

301
00:12:18.999 --> 00:12:21.936
 Socioeconomic Analysis Committee covered lubricants,

302
00:12:22.249 --> 00:12:22.655
 energy,

303
00:12:23.092 --> 00:12:23.795
 electronics,

304
00:12:23.999 --> 00:12:25.452
 and semiconductors,

305
00:12:25.483 --> 00:12:26.139
 as well as

306
00:12:26.639 --> 00:12:28.061
 PFAS manufacturing and...

307
00:12:28.311 --> 00:12:30.373
 The horizontal issues that you mentioned earlier.

308
00:12:30.374 --> 00:12:32.533
 So what were kind of the highlights from these?

309
00:12:33.295 --> 00:12:33.455
Well,

310
00:12:33.658 --> 00:12:34.416
 first highlights,

311
00:12:34.498 --> 00:12:38.158
 the sheer number of sectors that we were able to cover in one meeting.

312
00:12:38.197 --> 00:12:39.158
 That was a challenge,

313
00:12:39.299 --> 00:12:43.666
 but we were able to juggle all these different opinions that we had.

314
00:12:45.369 --> 00:12:47.853
 These sectors have all been covered to differing levels.

315
00:12:47.885 --> 00:12:48.994
 Let's say some we finished,

316
00:12:49.072 --> 00:12:50.135
 some we started,

317
00:12:50.416 --> 00:12:51.510
 some we continued.

318
00:12:51.619 --> 00:12:52.916
 So it's all different.

319
00:12:52.978 --> 00:12:54.119
 And so basically...

320
00:12:54.455 --> 00:12:55.316
 horizontal issues.

321
00:12:55.356 --> 00:12:56.838
 We continue then in December.

322
00:12:56.898 --> 00:12:59.539
 This has been going on throughout the process.

323
00:12:59.602 --> 00:13:04.602
 We periodically have brought this back to the committee to discuss what we have learned,

324
00:13:04.688 --> 00:13:06.203
 what we should change and so on.

325
00:13:06.703 --> 00:13:08.070
 So that is one that continues.

326
00:13:09.211 --> 00:13:11.438
 Now PFAS manufacturing also continues.

327
00:13:11.469 --> 00:13:14.891
 There we had what we call just a key issues discussion,

328
00:13:14.938 --> 00:13:15.312
 let's say.

329
00:13:15.422 --> 00:13:18.766
 So it was first describe what the dossier submitter has done,

330
00:13:18.844 --> 00:13:20.094
 give some initial impressions,

331
00:13:20.156 --> 00:13:23.906
 get some feedback from the committee as to what the rapporteurs proposed to do.

332
00:13:24.359 --> 00:13:26.759
 but no real opinion yet and no discussion.

333
00:13:26.820 --> 00:13:29.099
 That's coming in December and we expect to finish it then.

334
00:13:30.400 --> 00:13:31.962
 With electronics and semiconductors,

335
00:13:32.040 --> 00:13:39.064
 we focused just on semiconductors in this first meeting and we looked at the analysis of alternatives and also at the costs.

336
00:13:39.579 --> 00:13:43.525
 But we still need to bring it all back together by looking at the benefits,

337
00:13:43.603 --> 00:13:47.087
 then looking at the proportionality and derogations.

338
00:13:47.527 --> 00:13:49.689
 And also to look at electronics as a whole.

339
00:13:49.709 --> 00:13:50.929
 So that's quite a big sector.

340
00:13:50.990 --> 00:13:52.953
 Roberto mentioned that it's one of the sectors,

341
00:13:53.312 --> 00:13:54.433
 these two together,

342
00:13:54.472 --> 00:13:55.672
 electronics and semiconductors,

343
00:13:55.734 --> 00:13:58.281
 where we have received most comments.

344
00:13:58.437 --> 00:14:01.484
 And it is quite a lot of sub-uses as well.

345
00:14:01.562 --> 00:14:03.062
 So that's quite a lot of work.

346
00:14:03.125 --> 00:14:03.898
 But again,

347
00:14:03.929 --> 00:14:05.742
 we expect to finish in December.

348
00:14:06.633 --> 00:14:09.164
 And then we have finished energy,

349
00:14:10.476 --> 00:14:10.929
 which is good.

350
00:14:11.054 --> 00:14:11.929
 Also quite,

351
00:14:12.086 --> 00:14:12.336
 quite,

352
00:14:12.367 --> 00:14:13.086
 quite big one.

353
00:14:13.503 --> 00:14:16.426
 And they were talking about things like renewable energy generation,

354
00:14:16.506 --> 00:14:17.586
 hydrogen technology,

355
00:14:17.668 --> 00:14:18.168
 batteries.

356
00:14:18.207 --> 00:14:18.328
 So,

357
00:14:18.649 --> 00:14:18.887
 you know,

358
00:14:19.090 --> 00:14:19.250
 big,

359
00:14:19.367 --> 00:14:21.250
 chunky things to discuss.

360
00:14:21.813 --> 00:14:22.453
 So that one,

361
00:14:22.492 --> 00:14:24.571
 we had a key issues discussion,

362
00:14:24.594 --> 00:14:25.172
 as I mentioned,

363
00:14:25.492 --> 00:14:26.492
 for Vivas Manufacturing.

364
00:14:26.656 --> 00:14:27.656
 This one we had in March.

365
00:14:27.797 --> 00:14:28.914
 So now we have brought,

366
00:14:29.219 --> 00:14:29.477
 you know,

367
00:14:29.492 --> 00:14:31.539
 the actual opinion here.

368
00:14:31.555 --> 00:14:33.946
 And that one has been provisionally concluded as well.

369
00:14:34.649 --> 00:14:35.321
 And then finally,

370
00:14:35.383 --> 00:14:35.899
 lubricants.

371
00:14:35.961 --> 00:14:36.461
 Lubricants,

372
00:14:36.508 --> 00:14:39.602
 we had discussed in the last plenary.

373
00:14:39.633 --> 00:14:41.852
 We had discussed the analysis of alternatives,

374
00:14:41.914 --> 00:14:42.352
 basically.

375
00:14:43.075 --> 00:14:45.837
 And now we have done all the socioeconomic analysis,

376
00:14:45.838 --> 00:14:46.358
 so cost,

377
00:14:46.419 --> 00:14:46.880
 benefits,

378
00:14:46.919 --> 00:14:47.759
 proportionality,

379
00:14:47.841 --> 00:14:49.841
 and looked at the need for derogations.

380
00:14:50.282 --> 00:14:54.306
 And that's quite an interesting sector because it's a little bit different from the others.

381
00:14:54.345 --> 00:14:54.509
 It's,

382
00:14:54.563 --> 00:14:54.727
 well,

383
00:14:54.907 --> 00:14:56.587
 it's not a sector for starters,

384
00:14:56.588 --> 00:14:57.329
 it's more a use,

385
00:14:57.509 --> 00:14:59.477
 and it's very transferential.

386
00:14:59.524 --> 00:15:00.868
 So it covers,

387
00:15:01.477 --> 00:15:01.727
 you know,

388
00:15:02.196 --> 00:15:03.056
 it's used in many,

389
00:15:03.118 --> 00:15:05.790
 many of the different sectors that we have already looked at.

390
00:15:05.884 --> 00:15:06.462
 So it's,

391
00:15:06.837 --> 00:15:07.071
 you know,

392
00:15:07.259 --> 00:15:09.759
 a bit different in the approach that we have taken.

393
00:15:09.837 --> 00:15:11.306
 We've looked at it a little bit more.

394
00:15:11.591 --> 00:15:12.332
 across the board,

395
00:15:12.392 --> 00:15:12.732
 let's say.

396
00:15:12.853 --> 00:15:14.333
 So that one again,

397
00:15:14.593 --> 00:15:15.777
 finished for,

398
00:15:15.937 --> 00:15:16.156
 you know,

399
00:15:16.175 --> 00:15:20.339
 provisionally concluded in this plenary and done for now.

400
00:15:21.941 --> 00:15:22.222
All right.

401
00:15:22.245 --> 00:15:25.902
 So I saw that in all the sectors that you've covered,

402
00:15:25.988 --> 00:15:29.636
 you also discussed this options other than the restrictions.

403
00:15:29.667 --> 00:15:31.464
 So can you clarify to our audience,

404
00:15:31.870 --> 00:15:32.886
 what exactly does that mean?

405
00:15:33.823 --> 00:15:33.963
Yeah,

406
00:15:34.083 --> 00:15:38.967
 so basically one of the first things that we do when we start analysing a sector is to see,

407
00:15:39.189 --> 00:15:40.830
 is a restriction actually needed here?

408
00:15:40.831 --> 00:15:44.596
 Is a restriction the best way to deal with the risks that have been identified?

409
00:15:44.597 --> 00:15:44.752
 Because,

410
00:15:44.753 --> 00:15:45.135
 of course,

411
00:15:45.136 --> 00:15:46.752
 there's a lot of regulation out there,

412
00:15:47.236 --> 00:15:52.517
 a lot of regulation that even looks at environmental risks of some of the uses covered.

413
00:15:52.986 --> 00:15:58.392
 And we need to consider whether is there stuff out there that already does what needs to be done.

414
00:15:58.830 --> 00:16:01.142
 So there's many other different kinds of...

415
00:16:01.843 --> 00:16:02.083
 you know,

416
00:16:02.143 --> 00:16:03.544
 regulations and so on.

417
00:16:04.023 --> 00:16:07.383
 So that's the first step always when we start looking at things,

418
00:16:07.465 --> 00:16:07.746
 whether,

419
00:16:08.066 --> 00:16:08.344
 you know,

420
00:16:08.683 --> 00:16:12.062
 other voluntary initiatives already do what needs to be done,

421
00:16:12.125 --> 00:16:15.226
 are there other directives or regulations.

422
00:16:15.625 --> 00:16:16.562
 And so far,

423
00:16:16.586 --> 00:16:18.344
 we have always found that that's not the case.

424
00:16:18.609 --> 00:16:18.781
Right.

425
00:16:18.782 --> 00:16:19.703
 So restriction would be...

426
00:16:20.187 --> 00:16:24.531
A restriction under reach is the most appropriate risk management option that we have seen.

427
00:16:24.765 --> 00:16:24.953
Okay.

428
00:16:25.094 --> 00:16:25.984
 Thanks for clarifying that.

429
00:16:27.271 --> 00:16:31.734
 So how about the timelines then for you in terms of the next steps and opinions?

430
00:16:31.735 --> 00:16:33.418
 Is it the same as for the Risk Assessment Committee?

431
00:16:34.160 --> 00:16:34.777
Very similar,

432
00:16:34.840 --> 00:16:36.762
 but with one major difference.

433
00:16:37.160 --> 00:16:39.082
 So similarly to RAC,

434
00:16:39.121 --> 00:16:42.488
 we expect to conclude all our sector discussions in December.

435
00:16:42.848 --> 00:16:43.230
 But then,

436
00:16:43.402 --> 00:16:43.902
 of course,

437
00:16:44.027 --> 00:16:46.574
 there is quite a big job in putting everything together.

438
00:16:46.683 --> 00:16:48.105
 Exactly what Roberto said,

439
00:16:48.152 --> 00:16:49.168
 we'll have to do the same.

440
00:16:49.277 --> 00:16:51.340
 We have learned quite a lot as we've gone through.

441
00:16:51.355 --> 00:16:56.402
 So we really need to look at particularly some of the earlier sectors to make sure that everything is consistent there.

442
00:16:57.183 --> 00:16:57.824
 And yeah,

443
00:16:57.864 --> 00:16:58.404
 in March,

444
00:16:58.564 --> 00:17:01.606
 we expect to agree the SEAC draft opinion.

445
00:17:01.688 --> 00:17:03.250
 So you may notice,

446
00:17:03.251 --> 00:17:03.488
 you know,

447
00:17:03.489 --> 00:17:06.254
 the careful listeners may notice that I say,

448
00:17:06.395 --> 00:17:07.191
 I don't say adopt,

449
00:17:07.215 --> 00:17:07.871
 I say agree.

450
00:17:08.418 --> 00:17:10.012
 And that is because after that,

451
00:17:10.535 --> 00:17:11.074
 for SEAC,

452
00:17:11.113 --> 00:17:13.402
 there is a whole new stage out there,

453
00:17:13.793 --> 00:17:16.621
 which is a consultation on the SEAC draft opinion.

454
00:17:16.715 --> 00:17:20.559
 So the SEAC draft opinion is published and then there is a

455
00:17:20.981 --> 00:17:24.449
 60-day consultation that takes place on it.

456
00:17:24.606 --> 00:17:25.652
 and then we consider

457
00:17:25.963 --> 00:17:26.864
 all that information.

458
00:17:26.904 --> 00:17:30.789
 And then the plan is that by the end of 2026,

459
00:17:31.347 --> 00:17:33.629
 we will present to the committee an updated

460
00:17:34.074 --> 00:17:36.597
 SEAC opinion for adoption in this case.

461
00:17:36.636 --> 00:17:38.113
 So that's when we come to the end.

462
00:17:38.355 --> 00:17:38.574
Great.

463
00:17:38.793 --> 00:17:39.738
 So actually a good thing,

464
00:17:39.801 --> 00:17:45.019
 I would say that stakeholders will be able to have their say in the evaluation of this proposal.

465
00:17:45.566 --> 00:17:45.738
 Now,

466
00:17:45.941 --> 00:17:47.363
 given the interest on PFAS,

467
00:17:47.582 --> 00:17:50.660
 I'd assume you expect a lot of information through this consultation.

468
00:17:50.691 --> 00:17:53.613
 I know that was the case in previous consultations that we ran on this topic.

469
00:17:53.676 --> 00:17:54.910
 Some records were broken there.

470
00:17:54.957 --> 00:17:55.066
 So...

471
00:17:55.579 --> 00:17:56.659
 Can you talk a bit more about that?

472
00:17:56.739 --> 00:17:57.820
 What kind of things do you expect?

473
00:17:58.039 --> 00:17:58.560
Yeah,

474
00:17:58.619 --> 00:17:59.019
 exactly.

475
00:17:59.080 --> 00:18:01.141
 We expect quite a lot of contributions.

476
00:18:01.199 --> 00:18:08.445
 We know that there has been quite a lot of work being done throughout this evaluation by stakeholders out there to gather more information.

477
00:18:08.945 --> 00:18:15.648
 And we would be quite happy to receive that and to check whether that changes our conclusions in any way.

478
00:18:15.680 --> 00:18:20.164
 So it's important to note that the consultation now is on the SEAC draft opinion.

479
00:18:20.539 --> 00:18:21.945
 It's not on the proposal as a whole,

480
00:18:21.961 --> 00:18:23.023
 but on our opinion.

481
00:18:23.461 --> 00:18:23.586
 So...

482
00:18:24.547 --> 00:18:31.175
 What we're going to do is to be very careful about making sure that we are clear about what information is needed.

483
00:18:31.714 --> 00:18:32.292
 And for that,

484
00:18:32.714 --> 00:18:36.456
 we are organizing the consultation a little bit differently this time.

485
00:18:36.956 --> 00:18:40.308
 So what we will be doing is using what we call a survey format.

486
00:18:40.386 --> 00:18:45.073
 So we will be asking very concrete questions of the respondents,

487
00:18:46.026 --> 00:18:48.011
 basically on the key things for SEAC,

488
00:18:48.026 --> 00:18:53.354
 which are what is the impact of restricting the use of PFAS in the different sectors.

489
00:18:53.791 --> 00:18:57.315
 And also on the availability and feasibility of alternatives.

490
00:18:57.434 --> 00:18:58.835
 So those are the core.

491
00:18:58.897 --> 00:19:00.799
 So when I'm talking about potential impacts,

492
00:19:00.800 --> 00:19:01.057
 you know,

493
00:19:01.159 --> 00:19:01.581
 costs,

494
00:19:01.698 --> 00:19:03.018
 benefits and so on.

495
00:19:04.620 --> 00:19:05.885
 So basically,

496
00:19:05.886 --> 00:19:06.323
 as I said,

497
00:19:06.542 --> 00:19:07.104
 a survey.

498
00:19:07.323 --> 00:19:11.292
 And that means that no attachments can be submitted as part of the consultation.

499
00:19:11.354 --> 00:19:18.651
 So what we're asking respondents to do is to take the information that they have and use it to be able to answer our questions.

500
00:19:19.057 --> 00:19:22.104
 So the idea there is that we can help.

501
00:19:22.243 --> 00:19:28.726
 the stakeholders to make sure that they give us the information that we actually need and that we don't have to fish for it,

502
00:19:28.804 --> 00:19:29.183
 let's say,

503
00:19:29.503 --> 00:19:33.628
 in quite a lot of information that some of which may not be as relevant.

504
00:19:35.167 --> 00:19:35.285
 Yeah,

505
00:19:35.286 --> 00:19:37.964
 and this will also help the committee organise,

506
00:19:38.324 --> 00:19:42.027
 analyse and use the contributions very efficiently and effectively as well.

507
00:19:42.105 --> 00:19:46.995
 So this helps us reach our final opinion by the end of 2026 as expected.

508
00:19:47.667 --> 00:19:47.887
 And

509
00:19:48.408 --> 00:19:49.550
 I would also like to mention,

510
00:19:49.570 --> 00:19:53.171
 and this hopefully will be helpful to stakeholders,

511
00:19:53.632 --> 00:19:56.296
 that we will organise an online info session on the

512
00:19:56.679 --> 00:19:59.359
 30th of October 2025,

513
00:19:59.382 --> 00:20:03.804
 where we will provide quite a lot of information on the questions that we'll be asking.

514
00:20:04.366 --> 00:20:07.085
 And we will take questions as well,

515
00:20:07.101 --> 00:20:07.663
 because obviously,

516
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:08.226
 you know,

517
00:20:08.491 --> 00:20:09.741
 new things may emerge.

518
00:20:10.757 --> 00:20:16.070
 We will publish in advance some consultation guidelines and we will answer the questions that come in there.

519
00:20:16.607 --> 00:20:19.311
 And maybe something important to mention that we will do,

520
00:20:19.971 --> 00:20:20.211
 you know,

521
00:20:20.350 --> 00:20:21.291
 by popular demand,

522
00:20:21.373 --> 00:20:21.752
 let's say,

523
00:20:22.194 --> 00:20:23.994
 is we'll be doing some sector mapping.

524
00:20:24.135 --> 00:20:24.819
 So basically,

525
00:20:25.780 --> 00:20:30.623
 questions that we've been getting a lot during the plenaries and outside of the plenaries are,

526
00:20:31.045 --> 00:20:32.811
 where does my use fit in?

527
00:20:32.858 --> 00:20:34.061
 In which sector is it?

528
00:20:34.170 --> 00:20:38.436
 So we are doing our best to create a map of where everything fits in,

529
00:20:38.608 --> 00:20:41.514
 which we understand that the stakeholders will find quite helpful.

530
00:20:41.530 --> 00:20:42.436
 I'm sure that'll be useful,

531
00:20:42.437 --> 00:20:42.545
 yes.

532
00:20:42.546 --> 00:20:43.280
 That's what we've heard.

533
00:20:43.281 --> 00:20:43.389
 Yeah.

534
00:20:43.863 --> 00:20:44.264
 And of course,

535
00:20:44.265 --> 00:20:46.387
 we won't be able to cover everything in the first go,

536
00:20:46.946 --> 00:20:48.707
 but it'll be a living document.

537
00:20:48.727 --> 00:20:50.770
 So as questions come in about different sectors,

538
00:20:50.809 --> 00:20:51.813
 we'll keep asking them.

539
00:20:52.289 --> 00:20:55.516
 So that way people will know when the consultation comes out,

540
00:20:55.656 --> 00:20:56.617
 where should they answer,

541
00:20:56.680 --> 00:20:58.617
 where should they provide the information as well.

542
00:20:58.696 --> 00:20:58.821
 So,

543
00:20:59.492 --> 00:20:59.633
 yeah,

544
00:21:00.039 --> 00:21:00.774
 please tune in

545
00:21:01.196 --> 00:21:02.555
 30th of October this year.

546
00:21:03.102 --> 00:21:03.321
 And,

547
00:21:03.930 --> 00:21:04.196
 you know,

548
00:21:04.867 --> 00:21:08.664
 the information will continue to be added to the guidance documents after that.

549
00:21:09.352 --> 00:21:09.592
Okay,

550
00:21:09.632 --> 00:21:09.853
 thanks.

551
00:21:09.854 --> 00:21:11.194
 So I think the info session,

552
00:21:11.454 --> 00:21:13.958
 I really echo you there to invite people to join that.

553
00:21:13.977 --> 00:21:18.864
 I think it would be a useful way to understand what exactly is needed during the consultation.

554
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:20.661
 Then the consultation will follow in March,

555
00:21:20.700 --> 00:21:21.044
 you said,

556
00:21:21.481 --> 00:21:22.622
 this is after the committee meeting,

557
00:21:22.708 --> 00:21:22.887
 right?

558
00:21:22.965 --> 00:21:23.208
Yes,

559
00:21:23.583 --> 00:21:23.989
 exactly.

560
00:21:24.044 --> 00:21:27.614
 So we will discuss in the March plenaries.

561
00:21:27.833 --> 00:21:31.989
 And once the opinions are adopted in RAC and agreed in SEAC,

562
00:21:32.114 --> 00:21:32.614
 then the

563
00:21:33.036 --> 00:21:38.223
 SEAC opinion will be published and the consultation will start soon after the plenaries.

564
00:21:39.252 --> 00:21:39.492
Okay,

565
00:21:39.532 --> 00:21:39.653
 well,

566
00:21:39.893 --> 00:21:40.694
 that wraps up the

567
00:21:41.133 --> 00:21:42.135
 PFAS segment.

568
00:21:42.276 --> 00:21:44.135
 And as until now,

569
00:21:44.178 --> 00:21:47.221
 we will be coming back to this throughout the committee's opinion making.

570
00:21:47.260 --> 00:21:50.385
 The next obvious step there is after the December meetings.

571
00:21:50.706 --> 00:21:53.385
 So we will still be back with updates this year for you on that.

572
00:21:53.448 --> 00:21:54.526
 But next,

573
00:21:55.026 --> 00:21:59.065
 let's briefly discuss kind of what's ahead for the committees outside of PFAS.

574
00:21:59.159 --> 00:22:01.549
 There is also life outside of PFAS for the committees.

575
00:22:02.581 --> 00:22:04.549
 And one big part of this is ECHA,

576
00:22:04.815 --> 00:22:05.315
 our agency,

577
00:22:05.440 --> 00:22:07.674
 receiving new tasks under different regulations.

578
00:22:08.268 --> 00:22:08.378
 So...

579
00:22:08.828 --> 00:22:09.949
 due to these new tasks,

580
00:22:10.029 --> 00:22:14.553
 both committees will begin reviewing new kinds of restriction and exemption proposals,

581
00:22:14.693 --> 00:22:17.435
 which may lead to also new types of opinions.

582
00:22:17.498 --> 00:22:18.318
 It's quite early days,

583
00:22:18.319 --> 00:22:21.279
 so we don't know yet fully how these will materialize.

584
00:22:21.943 --> 00:22:25.420
 Can we go through which committee does what under each new task?

585
00:22:25.482 --> 00:22:27.967
 And when do you expect the first kind of dossiers to land?

586
00:22:29.185 --> 00:22:29.435
 Sure,

587
00:22:29.467 --> 00:22:30.545
maybe I can start.

588
00:22:30.576 --> 00:22:31.154
 But first,

589
00:22:31.170 --> 00:22:35.295
 I would like to express that I think we are pleased that new tasks are assigned,

590
00:22:35.296 --> 00:22:36.998
 have been assigned to both committees.

591
00:22:37.029 --> 00:22:38.014
 I think it's a major

592
00:22:38.500 --> 00:22:40.442
 of the good work we have done so far.

593
00:22:40.862 --> 00:22:41.243
 Of course,

594
00:22:41.262 --> 00:22:43.506
 this brings challenges and well,

595
00:22:43.507 --> 00:22:44.987
 you will hear from us in a second.

596
00:22:45.006 --> 00:22:46.167
 So maybe indeed,

597
00:22:46.612 --> 00:22:47.831
 in terms of new tasks,

598
00:22:47.846 --> 00:22:50.229
 I can mention the packaging and packaging waste,

599
00:22:50.854 --> 00:22:59.315
 where we will have to do sort of rich restrictions like for those in case the European Commission will ask us to carry out them.

600
00:22:59.909 --> 00:23:00.862
 We have also toys,

601
00:23:00.987 --> 00:23:01.518
 for instance,

602
00:23:01.519 --> 00:23:04.049
 the toys regulation where we have to look into

603
00:23:04.800 --> 00:23:07.701
 establish limit values for hazardous substances,

604
00:23:07.782 --> 00:23:11.981
 but also to check any migration limits that would be applicable.

605
00:23:12.082 --> 00:23:13.305
 So quite interesting.

606
00:23:13.922 --> 00:23:14.766
What about from your side,

607
00:23:14.782 --> 00:23:15.024
 Maria?

608
00:23:15.125 --> 00:23:15.242
 Yeah,

609
00:23:15.321 --> 00:23:16.422
quite a few as well.

610
00:23:17.141 --> 00:23:17.907
 For instance,

611
00:23:18.125 --> 00:23:22.102
 to add one that Roberto didn't mention is the restriction of hazardous substances.

612
00:23:22.899 --> 00:23:24.399
 There we have potentially,

613
00:23:25.117 --> 00:23:25.352
 you know,

614
00:23:25.508 --> 00:23:26.539
 restrictions as well,

615
00:23:26.649 --> 00:23:27.586
 restriction type work,

616
00:23:27.664 --> 00:23:32.961
 but also SEAC will be looking at exemptions from that restriction as well and we expect quite a few

617
00:23:33.648 --> 00:23:34.669
 different applications.

618
00:23:34.970 --> 00:23:35.911
 And you were asking as well,

619
00:23:35.970 --> 00:23:39.232
 when is the earliest time that we expect things?

620
00:23:39.575 --> 00:23:44.763
 So probably for this one and for toys are the ones that we expect things to come soonest.

621
00:23:44.818 --> 00:23:46.779
 So already 27.

622
00:23:47.263 --> 00:23:47.482
Okay.

623
00:23:49.044 --> 00:23:50.700
 What about in the batteries regulation?

624
00:23:50.950 --> 00:23:53.904
 ECA has had that task now for some time.

625
00:23:54.122 --> 00:23:56.263
 I don't remember exactly when we got it over,

626
00:23:56.388 --> 00:23:57.950
 but is there anything you can add from that?

627
00:23:58.044 --> 00:23:59.716
 Are there new tasks coming also through there?

628
00:24:00.432 --> 00:24:00.613
Well,

629
00:24:00.813 --> 00:24:01.073
 yes,

630
00:24:01.133 --> 00:24:05.095
 there will be restrictions coming in to the committee.

631
00:24:05.896 --> 00:24:06.119
 And,

632
00:24:06.580 --> 00:24:06.697
 well,

633
00:24:06.720 --> 00:24:09.619
 this has been the entry into force was already in 2023.

634
00:24:09.658 --> 00:24:09.783
 But,

635
00:24:09.799 --> 00:24:10.205
 of course,

636
00:24:10.244 --> 00:24:14.049
 there's work that needs to be done first before anything comes to the committee.

637
00:24:14.050 --> 00:24:14.744
 For starters,

638
00:24:14.806 --> 00:24:17.916
 there's a scoping study that is being done outside of the committees.

639
00:24:18.384 --> 00:24:21.588
 But then the restrictions are expected to start coming.

640
00:24:22.134 --> 00:24:25.275
 And the first one we expect may be 2029.

641
00:24:25.276 --> 00:24:26.791
That's quite a long runway.

642
00:24:27.532 --> 00:24:29.753
 What's kind of driving this 2029 start?

643
00:24:30.532 --> 00:24:30.692
Well,

644
00:24:30.852 --> 00:24:31.972
 usually with restrictions,

645
00:24:32.054 --> 00:24:33.452
 we are assessing a proposal.

646
00:24:33.534 --> 00:24:39.257
 So the proposal needs to first be done by outside of the committees for the committees to analyze.

647
00:24:39.272 --> 00:24:41.311
 So first we have the scoping study.

648
00:24:41.499 --> 00:24:42.913
 Then based on that,

649
00:24:42.952 --> 00:24:45.593
 there will be potential restrictions being prepared.

650
00:24:45.608 --> 00:24:46.733
 And then they come to the committee.

651
00:24:46.749 --> 00:24:46.983
Okay,

652
00:24:47.124 --> 00:24:47.421
 thank you.

653
00:24:47.436 --> 00:24:48.155
 That clarifies it.

654
00:24:49.514 --> 00:24:50.811
 And how will the,

655
00:24:51.233 --> 00:24:51.374
 well,

656
00:24:51.389 --> 00:24:53.780
 actually both committees interface with the existing?

657
00:24:54.720 --> 00:24:55.000
 ROS,

658
00:24:55.181 --> 00:24:56.222
 let's call it with its acronym,

659
00:24:56.302 --> 00:24:57.182
 exemption process.

660
00:24:57.222 --> 00:25:01.589
 So will the committees handle both the restriction proposals and the exemption reviews?

661
00:25:01.866 --> 00:25:04.050
 I think you mentioned actually already that you will also deal with the exemptions.

662
00:25:04.051 --> 00:25:04.167
Yeah,

663
00:25:04.168 --> 00:25:05.331
 we will be doing both,

664
00:25:05.409 --> 00:25:05.909
 exactly.

665
00:25:06.995 --> 00:25:07.175
 In

666
00:25:08.073 --> 00:25:12.011
 SEAC, we will be taking care of all the requests from exemptions from the industry.

667
00:25:12.198 --> 00:25:14.073
 RAC will be a little bit more ad hoc,

668
00:25:14.198 --> 00:25:16.636
 so we expect a proportion of them to go to RAC.

669
00:25:17.542 --> 00:25:18.104
 These are already,

670
00:25:18.136 --> 00:25:18.542
 of course,

671
00:25:18.589 --> 00:25:19.401
 being looked at.

672
00:25:19.761 --> 00:25:20.964
 There's a system out there,

673
00:25:21.104 --> 00:25:22.448
 so that will be coming to...

674
00:25:22.856 --> 00:25:22.997
 us.

675
00:25:23.057 --> 00:25:24.839
 So the way things are being done now,

676
00:25:24.861 --> 00:25:27.406
 I think with consultants looking at things,

677
00:25:27.925 --> 00:25:29.327
 is coming to the committees.

678
00:25:29.347 --> 00:25:35.480
 I think the idea is that they want something that has got the independence that the committees bring and,

679
00:25:35.941 --> 00:25:36.183
 you know,

680
00:25:36.238 --> 00:25:37.542
 rigorousness that the committees bring.

681
00:25:37.605 --> 00:25:37.784
 Right.

682
00:25:38.003 --> 00:25:38.183
Okay.

683
00:25:38.770 --> 00:25:41.132
 What about another acronym ELVs?

684
00:25:41.233 --> 00:25:42.913
 So end of life vehicles.

685
00:25:43.374 --> 00:25:45.577
 This was also something that was mentioned in the new tasks.

686
00:25:45.636 --> 00:25:46.679
 Can you say anything about that?

687
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:51.601
That's quite similar in terms of the type of tasks that we are discussing,

688
00:25:51.741 --> 00:25:52.507
 scoping study,

689
00:25:52.702 --> 00:25:53.382
 restrictions,

690
00:25:53.468 --> 00:25:56.226
 and then review of existing exemptions.

691
00:25:56.694 --> 00:26:01.148
 And similar also in that the exemptions are more to be done by SEAC than by RAC.

692
00:26:01.210 --> 00:26:01.851
All right.

693
00:26:01.898 --> 00:26:02.038
 Well,

694
00:26:02.054 --> 00:26:02.273
 I mean,

695
00:26:02.288 --> 00:26:03.069
 a packed outlook.

696
00:26:03.648 --> 00:26:04.491
 And as you said,

697
00:26:04.554 --> 00:26:04.819
 you know,

698
00:26:05.274 --> 00:26:13.121
 Clear kind of recognition of the work that the committees have been doing and a clear sign that the committee's remits are expanding across multiple pieces of legislation.

699
00:26:13.640 --> 00:26:16.867
 I think the takeaway for our audience is that the timelines are staggered.

700
00:26:16.921 --> 00:26:18.187
 We're at very early stages.

701
00:26:18.429 --> 00:26:19.828
 Evidence needs are evolving.

702
00:26:20.711 --> 00:26:21.343
 And early data,

703
00:26:21.390 --> 00:26:21.750
 I guess,

704
00:26:21.812 --> 00:26:22.296
 would matter.

705
00:26:22.468 --> 00:26:25.281
 So as soon as we have some kind of structure and things in place,

706
00:26:25.312 --> 00:26:31.203
 then getting your data prepared to carry these processes forward will be quite important also from the listener's sides.

707
00:26:31.578 --> 00:26:33.343
 So we'll keep you posted on these ones.

708
00:26:33.814 --> 00:26:36.718
 But then going into our final topic for today,

709
00:26:36.857 --> 00:26:38.640
 so titanium dioxide.

710
00:26:38.780 --> 00:26:39.179
 Roberto,

711
00:26:39.280 --> 00:26:41.401
 could you update us on where we are?

712
00:26:41.523 --> 00:26:42.839
 So just as a background,

713
00:26:42.886 --> 00:26:44.183
 in 2017,

714
00:26:44.184 --> 00:26:47.909
 the committee considered the substance to be a possible carcinogen,

715
00:26:48.066 --> 00:26:48.987
 category 2,

716
00:26:49.206 --> 00:26:49.855
 when inhaled.

717
00:26:50.245 --> 00:26:56.589
 The European Commission added this classification then to the CLP regulation in 2019.

718
00:26:56.698 --> 00:26:57.151
 However,

719
00:26:57.417 --> 00:27:01.042
 the European Court of Justice has now overturned that classification.

720
00:27:01.105 --> 00:27:02.823
 So from the committee's perspective,

721
00:27:03.094 --> 00:27:04.795
 How do you see this development?

722
00:27:05.036 --> 00:27:05.856
 What impact does it have?

723
00:27:07.239 --> 00:27:07.539
Yes,

724
00:27:07.579 --> 00:27:10.102
 I think it's good to spend a couple of minutes on this point.

725
00:27:10.461 --> 00:27:15.082
 We found that this case attracted quite some attention in the CLP community.

726
00:27:15.848 --> 00:27:19.965
 We also acknowledge it concerns a very specific set of circumstances,

727
00:27:20.168 --> 00:27:27.278
 and our taking of it does not alter overall BRAC's general approach to the scientific opinion-making.

728
00:27:28.366 --> 00:27:31.049
Could you spell out those specific circumstances that you mentioned?

729
00:27:31.069 --> 00:27:34.432
 And do you see any kind of lessons learned for similar cases more broadly?

730
00:27:35.373 --> 00:27:35.533
Yeah,

731
00:27:35.572 --> 00:27:35.834
 indeed.

732
00:27:35.835 --> 00:27:37.553
 In our preliminary assessment,

733
00:27:37.654 --> 00:27:38.514
 we had the impression,

734
00:27:38.639 --> 00:27:39.178
 for instance,

735
00:27:39.194 --> 00:27:45.850
 that RAC was not very clear in listing the key evidence that led to the classification conclusion.

736
00:27:45.897 --> 00:27:46.569
 Apparently,

737
00:27:47.022 --> 00:27:47.444
 the court,

738
00:27:47.522 --> 00:27:49.834
 that's an element that has been criticizing the opinion.

739
00:27:50.412 --> 00:27:52.194
 So we are carefully looking into it.

740
00:27:53.182 --> 00:27:54.243
 probably restructuring,

741
00:27:54.302 --> 00:28:01.361
 reformatting the information in a way that every time you use weight of evidence or you identify the key evidence,

742
00:28:01.564 --> 00:28:09.751
 this is very clearly stated and drafted in a way that would lead actually to an easy-to-even assessment to no scientific,

743
00:28:10.126 --> 00:28:10.423
 let's say,

744
00:28:10.626 --> 00:28:12.345
 audience when it is the case.

745
00:28:13.705 --> 00:28:15.548
 I think also from the practical point of view,

746
00:28:16.173 --> 00:28:17.486
 as a result of the judgment,

747
00:28:18.230 --> 00:28:23.535
 It means that the classification of titanium dioxide that was issued by the European Commission has been annulled.

748
00:28:24.136 --> 00:28:27.422
 And this means that actually this is no longer bounding.

749
00:28:27.500 --> 00:28:29.781
 And we're also updating our own RAC opinion,

750
00:28:29.859 --> 00:28:33.508
 mentioning for full transparency also the outcome of this judgment.

751
00:28:34.164 --> 00:28:34.414
 And

752
00:28:35.179 --> 00:28:38.351
 I think we will come back maybe on this point once we will have a more,

753
00:28:39.273 --> 00:28:39.648
 let's say,

754
00:28:39.804 --> 00:28:44.539
 general overview on what we intend to do to be sure to address any potential follow-up.

755
00:28:45.320 --> 00:28:45.523
Okay.

756
00:28:45.754 --> 00:28:45.914
 Good.

757
00:28:46.034 --> 00:28:46.355
 Thank you.

758
00:28:46.356 --> 00:28:48.797
 I think that wraps up the titanium dioxide point then.

759
00:28:49.498 --> 00:28:51.939
 And actually also brings us to the end of our episode today.

760
00:28:52.021 --> 00:28:53.642
 So we've covered quite a lot of ground,

761
00:28:53.763 --> 00:28:56.982
 obviously PFAS taking up the bulk of our episode as it usually does,

762
00:28:57.802 --> 00:28:58.490
 where both committees,

763
00:28:58.491 --> 00:28:59.209
 as mentioned before,

764
00:28:59.287 --> 00:29:01.185
 are moving toward year end conclusions.

765
00:29:02.216 --> 00:29:05.216
 We also have a packed pipeline of new tasks across packaging,

766
00:29:05.279 --> 00:29:05.591
 toys,

767
00:29:05.670 --> 00:29:06.248
 batteries,

768
00:29:06.795 --> 00:29:12.779
 ROS and end of life vehicles that will involve new areas of work over the next few years.

769
00:29:13.038 --> 00:29:17.117
 And then we also got the update on the latest on titanium dioxide,

770
00:29:17.277 --> 00:29:19.840
 including what the court's recent ruling had in it.

771
00:29:20.340 --> 00:29:20.500
 Now,

772
00:29:20.680 --> 00:29:21.559
 before we close,

773
00:29:21.723 --> 00:29:23.363
 something that we would like to try,

774
00:29:23.520 --> 00:29:25.184
 something a little bit different in the format,

775
00:29:25.684 --> 00:29:27.145
 is to engage a bit more with you,

776
00:29:27.223 --> 00:29:27.879
 our listeners,

777
00:29:28.004 --> 00:29:29.949
 and to collect questions for our episodes,

778
00:29:29.981 --> 00:29:33.090
 particularly for this committee podcast series that we do.

779
00:29:33.309 --> 00:29:39.059
 So if you have any questions or topics that you would like Roberto and Maria to unpack in our next episodes,

780
00:29:39.418 --> 00:29:40.918
 you can send them to us by email.

781
00:29:41.566 --> 00:29:44.887
 The address is video at eka.europa.eu.

782
00:29:45.006 --> 00:29:46.768
 You'll also find that in the episode description.

783
00:29:47.229 --> 00:29:49.049
 And we will then pick topics,

784
00:29:49.167 --> 00:29:55.229
 questions that fit into the overall scope of our episodes and try to address them in our next episode.

785
00:29:55.230 --> 00:29:58.026
 So you can already start submitting those now for the December episode.

786
00:29:58.417 --> 00:29:59.010
 But for today,

787
00:29:59.354 --> 00:30:00.854
 thank you for listening and goodbye.

788
00:30:05.229 --> 00:30:06.932
 Safer Chemicals Podcast.

789
00:30:07.651 --> 00:30:09.776
 Sound science on harmful chemicals.

